Original Research

Who drives transparency? Examining the role of pay, power and people in remuneration governance disclosure

Moses Jachi, Henriette E. Scholtz, George F. Nel
Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences | Vol 19, No 1 | a1066 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v19i1.1066 | © 2026 Moses Jachi, Henriette E. Scholtz, George F. Nel | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 03 July 2025 | Published: 16 January 2026

About the author(s)

Moses Jachi, School of Accountancy, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Henriette E. Scholtz, School of Accountancy, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
George F. Nel, School of Accountancy, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Abstract

Orientation: This study investigates the structural and behavioural determinants of remuneration governance disclosure (RGD) among Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE)-listed firms. It frames pay (incentive remuneration) as a behavioural driver, power (board characteristics) as a structural mechanism, and people (ownership structures) as embodying both roles.
Research purpose: The study examines the impact of executive remuneration structures, board dynamics and ownership patterns on RGD, providing insights into transparency practices within JSE-listed firms.
Motivation for the study: The motivation stems from growing concerns over corporate transparency and accountability in emerging markets, particularly in South Africa, where governance and disclosure are critical for mitigating information symmetry and enhancing stakeholder confidence.
Research approach/design and method: The study employs a cross-sectional analysis of firm-level data from JSE-listed firms for the 2023 financial year. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression were used to assess the influence of incentive-based remuneration, board characteristics, and ownership structures on RGD.
Main findings: Firms with higher levels of incentive-based executive remuneration, larger board sizes and greater institutional ownership are associated with significantly enhanced RGDs. This highlights the critical role of incentive alignment, governance architecture and ownership oversight in shaping corporate disclosure behaviour.
Practical/managerial implications: Policymakers and regulatory bodies may consider strengthening RGD frameworks to bolster investor trust and ethical governance across South Africa and comparable jurisdictions.
Contribution/value-add: This study contributes to the literature by investigating how pay, power and people influence remuneration disclosure outcomes, advancing understanding of the governance mechanisms that drive transparency.


Keywords

remuneration governance disclosure; incentive remuneration; board characteristics; ownership structure; transparency

JEL Codes

D22: Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis; J33: Compensation Packages • Payment Methods; M52: Compensation and Compensation Methods and Their Effects

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 8: Decent work and economic growth

Metrics

Total abstract views: 286
Total article views: 207


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.