Original Research
A critical analysis of the current SARS model for the disclosure of reportable arrangements and a proposed alternative
Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences | Vol 5, No 2 | a291 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v5i2.291
| © 2018 Lee-Ann Steenkamp, Peter Cramer
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 28 June 2018 | Published: 31 October 2012
Submitted: 28 June 2018 | Published: 31 October 2012
About the author(s)
Lee-Ann Steenkamp, Department of Accounting, University of Stellenbosch, South Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsPeter Cramer, College of Accounting, University of Cape Town, South Africa
Full Text:
PDF (326KB)Abstract
The reportable arrangements (RA) provisions are contained in sections 80M to 80T of the Income Tax Act. SARS issued a revised Draft Guide on 31 March 2010, which contains a model for the application of these provisions. However, due to numerous discrepancies and ambiguities contained in the Act and the guide, the interpretation of these provisions could be subjective and difficult to apply in practice. Failure to disclose a RA may result in a R1 million penalty. It is the purpose of this paper to develop an alternative, workable model to serve as a usable guide for taxpayers. This paper comprises a literature review and a study of empirical evidence obtained through a survey conducted among tax partners at a sample of 40 leading audit and legal firms. The majority of respondents considered the alternative model to be more accurate, user-friendly and helpful than SARS’ model.
Keywords
arrangement; reportable; tax benefit; SARS; penalty; SAICA; Tax Administration Bill
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1999Total article views: 760
Crossref Citations
1. A critical analysis of the foreign services reportable arrangement provision of the Tax Administration Act of South Africa
Marlene Oosthuizen, Cara Thiart
South African Journal of Economic and management Sciences vol: 23 issue: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.4102/sajems.v23i1.3248