Original Research
Administrative penalties: Impact and alternatives
Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences | Vol 4, No 3 | a370 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v4i3.370
| © 2018 Jason Aproskie, Sha’ista Goga
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 01 July 2018 | Published: 31 August 2011
Submitted: 01 July 2018 | Published: 31 August 2011
About the author(s)
Jason Aproskie, Genesis Analytics (Pty) Ltd, Hyde Park, Johannesburg, South AfricaSha’ista Goga, Genesis Analytics (Pty) Ltd, Hyde Park, Johannesburg, Somalia
Full Text:
PDF (146KB)Abstract
Administrative penalties are imposed in South Africa for a specified set of prohibited practices. These are typically the most egregious anti-competitive acts, and therefore the main purpose of administrative penalties is to act as a deterrent, both to the offending firm and to other firms that may consider engaging in similar behaviour. With a spate of high-profile cases resulting in fines, there has been much discussion over fines and their ultimate impact on businesses and consumers. We discuss three arguments that have been raised. Firstly, we consider whether companies simply pass the cost of their fine through to consumers in the form of higher prices. Secondly, we look at the validity of the complaint that high fines could lead to poorer competitive outcomes due to firm exit. Thirdly, we assess suggested alternative mechanisms for disbursing the fine such as paying the fine in the form of lower prices.
Keywords
administrative penalties; fines; competition; firm exit; alternative fining methods; pricing; pass-through
Metrics
Total abstract views: 2128Total article views: 912