Original Research

Statistical modelling of Zimbabwe’s international tourist arrivals using both symmetric and asymmetric volatility models

Delson Chikobvu, Tendai Makoni
Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences | Vol 12, No 1 | a426 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v12i1.426 | © 2019 Delson Chikobvu, Tendai Makoni | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 12 October 2018 | Published: 25 July 2019

About the author(s)

Delson Chikobvu, Department of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
Tendai Makoni, Department of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Abstract

Orientation: Modelling of international tourist arrivals’ volatility is vital for marketing, planning, policy formulation and investment purposes among others. Symmetric and asymmetric tourism volatility models for years 2000–2017 were fitted to assess the impact of good and bad news on Zimbabwe’s international tourist arrivals’ volatility.

Research purpose: In this article, we model Zimbabwe’s monthly international tourist arrivals’ volatility using both symmetric and asymmetric volatility models and investigate the impact of good and bad news on international tourist arrivals’ volatility.

Motivation for the study: Very few, if any, research papers have looked at volatility clustering and the impact of good and bad news on Zimbabwe’s international tourist arrivals’ volatility. These are important aspects for tourism managers, investors and the government in decision-making processes.

Research design, approach and method: The ARMA-GARCH and ARMA-EGARCH models were used to model tourism volatility.

Main findings: The ARMA(1,1)-GARCH(1,1) model under the t-distribution (STD) innovations shows unexpected tourism shocks having a strong impact, that persists for significant periods of time, on Zimbabwe’s tourist arrivals. The ARMA(1,1)-EGARCH(1,1) model under STD innovations indicated less impact of bad news on future tourism volatility than good news of the same size because the symmetry coefficient gamma (γ) is statistically significant and is above zero.

Practical/managerial implications: Tourism volatility models unearth the impact of news on international tourist arrivals’ volatility. Good news attracts tourism investors, while bad news discourages tourism investors from investing. Tourism stakeholders, government and investors can use these informative volatility models to the success of the tourism industry in Zimbabwe.

Contribution/value-add: This article highlights the importance of volatility models in the tourism industry.


Keywords

international tourist arrival; GARCH models; EGARCH; TGARCH; APARCH; volatility; persistence

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3993
Total article views: 5060

 

Crossref Citations

1. Effects of Multiple Financial News Shocks on Tourism Demand Volatility Modelling and Forecasting
Yuruixian Zhang, Wei Chong Choo, Yuhanis Abdul Aziz, Choy Leong Yee, Cheong Kin Wan, Jen Sim Ho
Journal of Risk and Financial Management  vol: 15  issue: 7  first page: 279  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3390/jrfm15070279

2. Implications of Misleading News Reporting on Tourism at the Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe
William Mushawemhuka, Gijsbert Hoogendoorn, Jennifer M. Fitchett
Weather, Climate, and Society  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-21-0013.1

3. International tourist arrivals modelling and forecasting: A case of Zimbabwe
Tendai Makoni, Gideon Mazuruse, Brighton Nyagadza
Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship  vol: 2  issue: 1  first page: 100027  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1016/j.stae.2022.100027

4. Single or Combine? Tourism Demand Volatility Forecasting with Exponential Weighting and Smooth Transition Combining Methods
Yuruixian Zhang, Wei Chong Choo, Jen Sim Ho, Cheong Kin Wan
Computation  vol: 10  issue: 8  first page: 137  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3390/computation10080137

5. Towards quantifying climate suitability for Zimbabwean nature-based tourism
William J. Mushawemhuka, Jennifer M. Fitchett, Gijsbert Hoogendoorn
South African Geographical Journal  vol: 103  issue: 4  first page: 443  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1080/03736245.2020.1835703