Original Research

Running up or down: why is there a difference in spending?

Martinette Kruger, Melville Saayman
Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences | Vol 8, No 1 | a84 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v8i1.84 | © 2015 Martinette Kruger, Melville Saayman | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 21 December 2017 | Published: 30 April 2015

About the author(s)

Martinette Kruger, Tourism Research in Economic Environs and Society, North-West University, South Africa
Melville Saayman, Tourism Research in Economic Environs and Society, North-West University, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (192KB)

Abstract

This study investigated the determinants of participant spending at the Comrades Marathon ‘up’ run (Durban to Pietermaritzburg) and ‘down’ run (Pietermaritzburg to Durban). A participant survey conducted at the race in 2011 and 2012, using regression analyses, found that more behavioural than socio-demographic determinants had a significant influence on spending at both races. The two groups of participants had very similar profiles, but their spending at the event differed significantly in the way it was distributed between the ‘up’ and ‘down’ runs, and the spending was higher at the former. The reasons for the difference are currently unknown, but the implication is that the ‘up’ and the ‘down’ runs may have different economic outcomes. Although this cannot be confirmed on the basis of surveys of just two years’ Comrades runs, the findings could offer strategic insights for marketing the event and enhancing its economic impact and competitive advantage.

Keywords

sport tourism; ultra-marathon; determinants of spending; regression analysis; Comrades Marathon; South Africa

Metrics

Total abstract views: 2831
Total article views: 1188

 

Crossref Citations

1. Why Standardization of Festival Marketing Might be a Cheesy Affair
Melville Saayman, Andrea Saayman
Event Management  vol: 23  issue: 3  first page: 447  year: 2019  
doi: 10.3727/152599519X15506259855805

2. When sport becomes a way of life – a lifestyle market segmentation approach
Esmarie Myburgh, Martinette Kruger, Melville Saayman
Managing Sport and Leisure  vol: 24  issue: 1-3  first page: 97  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1080/23750472.2019.1590156

3. One ultramarathon, two cities: differences in social impact perceptions
Marco Scholtz
Journal of Sport & Tourism  vol: 23  issue: 4  first page: 181  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1080/14775085.2019.1654905

4. Açık Alan Etkinlikleri Katılımcılarının Etkinlik Öznitelik Düşüncelerinin Seyahat Davranışına Olan Etkisi
Evrim BÖYÜKELHAN, Ceren GÜMÜŞGÜL, Eyüp ACAR, Ufuk DİLEKÇİ
Spor Eğitim Dergisi  vol: 7  issue: 3  first page: 223  year: 2023  
doi: 10.55238/seder.1355046

5. Aspects influencing the commitment of endurance athletes: a tourism perspective
Esmarie Myburgh, Martinette Kruger, Melville Saayman
Journal of Sport & Tourism  vol: 22  issue: 4  first page: 275  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1080/14775085.2018.1472032

6. Summary of cognitive, affective, and behavioural outcomes of consuming prestigious sports events
Miguel Moital, Amy Bain, Harriet Thomas
Sport Management Review  vol: 22  issue: 5  first page: 652  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2018.10.003

7. Steering Clear: A 3-E Typology of Motorcycle Event Visitors
Martinette Kruger, Hanneri Borstlap
Event Management  vol: 23  issue: 3  first page: 465  year: 2019  
doi: 10.3727/152599518X15378845225429

8. Hold your horses! A typology of endurance horse-riding participants
Martinette Kruger, Adam Viljoen, Daniélle Cronjé
Managing Sport and Leisure  vol: 26  issue: 6  first page: 443  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1080/23750472.2020.1753097